大家再ping一下这三个网址，贴下结果，谢谢！

icer

再次感谢asnake，给了两个线路供选择
为了将来连接北侠速度更快，请大家积极参与网速测试
测试方法如下：
开始-运行-cmd，在弹出的dos窗口中依次打如下三个命令（一个命令运行结束再打下一个）：
ping 61.49.40.42
ping 114.112.188.15
ping pkuxkx.com

然后用鼠标右键把结果copy paste上来，记得写自己所在的线路！！！
结果示例如下：

北京联通

Microsoft Windows [版本 6.0.6001]
版权所有 (C) 2006 Microsoft Corporation。保留所有权利。
C:\Users\Administrator>ping 61.49.40.42
正在 Ping 61.49.40.42 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 61.49.40.42 的回复: 字节=32 时间=5ms TTL=245
来自 61.49.40.42 的回复: 字节=32 时间=3ms TTL=245
来自 61.49.40.42 的回复: 字节=32 时间=3ms TTL=245
来自 61.49.40.42 的回复: 字节=32 时间=3ms TTL=245
61.49.40.42 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 3ms，最长 = 5ms，平均 = 3ms
C:\Users\Administrator>ping 114.112.188.15
正在 Ping 114.112.188.15 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 114.112.188.15 的回复: 字节=32 时间=3ms TTL=117
来自 114.112.188.15 的回复: 字节=32 时间=2ms TTL=117
来自 114.112.188.15 的回复: 字节=32 时间=3ms TTL=117
来自 114.112.188.15 的回复: 字节=32 时间=4ms TTL=117
114.112.188.15 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 2ms，最长 = 4ms，平均 = 3ms
C:\Users\Administrator>ping pkuxkx.com
正在 Ping pkuxkx.com [111.67.200.17] 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 111.67.200.17 的回复: 字节=32 时间=2ms TTL=54
来自 111.67.200.17 的回复: 字节=32 时间=3ms TTL=54
来自 111.67.200.17 的回复: 字节=32 时间=3ms TTL=54
来自 111.67.200.17 的回复: 字节=32 时间=3ms TTL=54
111.67.200.17 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 2ms，最长 = 3ms，平均 = 2ms

lzkd

无锡电信 2M ADSL 路由上网


Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=245
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=245
Request timed out.
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 61.49.40.42:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 176ms, Maximum = 177ms, Average = 176ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 114.112.188.15

Pinging 114.112.188.15 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=117
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=117
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=117
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=117

Ping statistics for 114.112.188.15:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 71ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 72ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping pkuxkx.com

Pinging pkuxkx.com [111.67.200.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=55
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=55
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=55
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 111.67.200.17:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 71ms, Maximum = 72ms, Average = 71ms

jason

北京电信
C:\Documents and Settings\jzhang>ping 61.49.40.42

Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=248
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=248
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=248
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=248

Ping statistics for 61.49.40.42:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 4ms, Average = 2ms

C:\Documents and Settings\jzhang>ping 114.112.188.15

Pinging 114.112.188.15 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=120
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=120
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=120
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=120

Ping statistics for 114.112.188.15:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 4ms, Average = 3ms



C:\Documents and Settings\jzhang>ping pkuxkx.com

Pinging pkuxkx.com [111.67.200.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=57
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=57
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=57
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 111.67.200.17:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 4ms, Average = 2ms

全部超快，对我没区别。

lzkd

原帖由 jason 于 2009-11-12 05:56 PM 发表
北京电信
C:\Documents and Settings\jzhang>ping 61.49.40.42

Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=248
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=3m ...

这位主真的太那啥了.....口水ing

asnake

北京电信 adsl          同样是北京电信，为啥差别这么大....

Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=249
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=249
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=249
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=249

Ping statistics for 61.49.40.42:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 16ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 114.112.188.15

Pinging 114.112.188.15 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=121
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=121
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=121
Reply from 114.112.188.15: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=121

Ping statistics for 114.112.188.15:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 14ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping pkuxkx.com

Pinging pkuxkx.com [111.67.200.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=58
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=58
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=58
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 111.67.200.17:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 14ms

hackyfrank

Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 61.49.40.42

Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=352ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=351ms TTL=236

Ping statistics for 61.49.40.42:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 351ms, Maximum = 353ms, Average = 352ms

Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 61.49.40.42

Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=352ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=351ms TTL=236

Ping statistics for 61.49.40.42:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 351ms, Maximum = 353ms, Average = 352ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>
Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 61.49.40.42

Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=352ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=236
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=351ms TTL=236

Ping statistics for 61.49.40.42:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 351ms, Maximum = 353ms, Average = 352ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>

asnake

楼上那的网络  都是352 .....

icer

原帖由 asnake 于 2009-11-12 06:01 PM 发表
北京电信 adsl          同样是北京电信，为啥差别这么大....

Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=249
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=11m ...

从ttl来看，你离目标主机最近，哈哈

xiaodog

福州电信
Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 61.49.40.42

Pinging 61.49.40.42 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=242
Reply from 61.49.40.42: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 61.49.40.42:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 60ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 111.67.200.17

Pinging 111.67.200.17 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=53
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=53
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=53
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 111.67.200.17:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 54ms, Maximum = 55ms, Average = 54ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping pkuxkx.com

Pinging pkuxkx.com [111.67.200.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=53
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=53
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=53
Reply from 111.67.200.17: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 111.67.200.17:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 54ms, Maximum = 56ms, Average = 55ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>

icer

原帖由 asnake 于 2009-11-12 06:02 PM 发表
楼上那的网络  都是352 .....

貌似在国外，瓶颈不在国内了